domain name

Introduction

In today’s digital economy, a domain name is far more than a simple web address – it is a strategic business asset. It defines a company’s online identity, drives visibility, and secures customer trust.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has announced that a new round of generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs) will be launched in the coming years. With the recent designation of dispute resolution providers for this next round, the process is accelerating – and businesses must start preparing now.

Dreyfus, a leading law firm specializing in intellectual property and digital strategy, provides full support in domain name management, including assistance in preparing and filing new gTLD applications with ICANN.

Why Domain Names Are Strategic Business Assets

Domain names play a central role in digital strategy:

• They define a company’s digital identity.
• They safeguard brands against cybersquatting and misuse.
• They enhance visibility and credibility worldwide.
• They build customer trust and protect corporate reputation.

Example: A banking institution that loses control of a key domain name exposes itself to phishing risks, financial loss, and severe damage to brand reputation.

New gTLDs: A Unique Opportunity for Brands

ICANN’s new gTLD program aims to expand and diversify the Internet space by allowing organizations to obtain new extensions such as .shop, .bank, or even proprietary .brand domains.

Lessons from the Previous Round

In the first round launched in 2012:

• Nearly 1,930 applications were submitted.
• Over 600 .brand domains were delegated, enabling global companies to control their own extensions.
• Key sectors such as luxury, finance, and technology secured strategic gTLDs.

Strategic Benefits

• Brand empowerment: owning a .brand creates a powerful marketing tool.
• Enhanced cybersecurity: full control of the namespace reduces phishing and fraud.
• Operational flexibility: simplified management of subdomains under a proprietary extension.
• Competitive edge: stronger visibility and differentiation in crowded markets.

The Risks of Inaction

Failing to prepare for the next gTLD round can result in:

• Loss of strategic extensions to competitors.
• Brand misuse and cybersquatting by malicious actors.
• Costly disputes (UDRP, URS, national ADR procedures).
• Reduced online visibility compared to proactive competitors.

Real-world example: several companies that did not anticipate the 2012 round had to buy back domains at exorbitant prices, sometimes exceeding hundreds of thousands of dollars.

How to Prepare for the Next ICANN Round

A Practical Checklist

1. Map your critical domains: identify domains linked to your trademarks, products, and markets.
2. Define your strategy: offensive (filing a .brand) or defensive (securing key generic extensions).
3. Allocate budget and resources: ICANN fees, technical costs, legal support.
4. Monitor ICANN developments: stay ahead of rule updates and timelines.
5. Build a compliant application: legal, technical, and financial readiness.

Case Studies

• Global luxury group: applied for a .brand to secure all digital assets under a single trusted namespace.
• Industrial mid-size company: adopted a defensive strategy by protecting its trademarks in strategic generic extensions (.tech, .industry).
• Tech start-up: focused on monitoring and successfully recovered a hijacked domain via a UDRP proceeding.

Dreyfus’ End-to-End Support for gTLD Applications

Applying for a gTLD is a complex process requiring legal, technical, and financial expertise. Dreyfus offers comprehensive assistance at every stage:

• Portfolio audit: identifying risks and opportunities.
• Strategic advice: determining whether to pursue a .brand application or adopt a defensive approach.
• Legal assistance: preparing and submitting ICANN applications, ensuring compliance with contractual obligations.
• Operational management: coordinating with technical providers and liaising with ICANN.
• Continuous monitoring: implementing surveillance tools to prevent misuse and anticipate disputes.

Why Choose Dreyfus?

• 20+ years of expertise in intellectual property and domain names.
• Active involvement in international organizations (ICANN, INTA).
• International recognition in global rankings (IP Stars, Top 250 Women in IP, etc.).
• A multidisciplinary team combining law, technology, and digital strategy.

Future Trends: The Impact of New gTLDs

• Cybersecurity: .brand domains will significantly reduce phishing and fake websites.
• Sectoral growth: industries such as healthcare, finance, and luxury are expected to adopt gTLDs aggressively.
• Digital transformation: gTLDs will interact with AI, blockchain, and Web3, shaping future digital identities.

FAQ – New gTLDs and Domain Name Strategy

What is a gTLD?
A generic Top-Level Domain (gTLD) is an extension such as .com, .shop, or .brand.

Why should I apply for a gTLD?
To strengthen your brand’s online identity, secure your assets, and gain full control over your namespace.

What is the timeline?
ICANN is preparing the next round; the timeline is expected to be announced soon. Businesses must start preparing their applications in advance.

How much does it cost?
The cost includes ICANN application fees, technical provider expenses, and legal advisory services.

What if I don’t apply for a gTLD?
You can still protect your brand with a defensive strategy and enforce your rights through UDRP, URS, or national ADR mechanisms.

Conclusion: Anticipate Your Domain Strategy Now

Domain names are no longer just online addresses – they are long-term strategic assets. The upcoming ICANN gTLD round presents a unique opportunity for forward-thinking companies.

By partnering with Dreyfus, you gain access to international expertise and full-service support to prepare, file, and protect your gTLD applications.

Contact our team today to schedule a portfolio audit and start building your gTLD strategy.

In today’s digital economy, domain names are at the heart of corporate strategies. With the growing number of disputes, the rise of cybersquatting, and new challenges linked to cybersecurity, e-commerce and emerging technologies, trusted expertise has become indispensable.

At the Domain Summit Europe – London 2025, held from 1 to 3 September 2025 at the Business Design Centre, London, Nathalie Dreyfus, French Intellectual Property Attorney and founder of Dreyfus, will share her insights on the latest developments and strategies for protecting and defending digital assets worldwide.

A leading authority in domain name disputes

Recognized among the Top 250 Women in IP and consistently ranked by WTR 1000, IP Stars and Legal 500, Nathalie Dreyfus is one of the most prominent figures in intellectual property.

For over two decades, she has advised companies and institutions in more than 60 countries, helping them protect and enhance their intangible assets — particularly domain names, which have become strategic assets in their own right.

As a frequent conference speaker, trainer, and panelist for international institutions, she regularly addresses cutting-edge issues such as cybersecurity, blockchain, new domain extensions, and global brand enforcement strategies.

Why domain names are critical for businesses today

A domain name is no longer just an internet address. It represents:

• An economic asset: it directly impacts visibility, credibility, and brand reputation.
• A legal issue: cybersquatting, impersonation, and counterfeiting make disputes inevitable.
• An international challenge: businesses expanding online must anticipate risks on a global scale.
• A cybersecurity concern: domain names are prime targets for fraud and digital attacks.

In this context, insights from experts like Nathalie Dreyfus are essential to guide professionals on best practices for managing and defending domain portfolios.

Speaking at the Domain Summit Europe – London 2025

The Domain Summit Europe is a must-attend event for registrars, registries, investors, legal professionals, branding and SEO experts, startups, and digital entrepreneurs.

At this year’s edition, Nathalie Dreyfus will address the topic:

“Domain Names: Latest Developments and Strategic Insights to Anticipate Disputes and Strengthen Global Digital Presence.”

Her presentation will cover:

• Recent developments on domain extensions and their impact on brand owners,
• Effective mechanisms for resolving domain disputes,
• Proactive management strategies to prevent litigation,
• The intersection between trademarks and domain names in today’s digital economy.

Dreyfus: international reach and expertise

Founded by Nathalie Dreyfus, the Paris-based firm supports clients across Europe, the United States, Asia, and the Middle East. Its services include:

• Trademark filing and portfolio management,
• Domain name monitoring and enforcement,
• Online anti-counterfeiting and cybersquatting litigation,
• Strategic advice on emerging technologies.

This international reach allows the firm to deliver tailored and proactive strategies to meet today’s digital challenges.

Video presentation

On the occasion of the conference, we invite you to watch Nathalie Dreyfus’s video presentation.

Conclusion

The participation of Nathalie Dreyfus in the Domain Summit Europe – London 2025 highlights the growing importance of domain names as key intangible assets.
Her contribution will provide valuable insights for companies and legal professionals seeking to anticipate risks, strengthen digital strategies, and secure their global presence online.

📅 Dates: 1–3 September 2025 (main program on 2–3 September)
📍 Venue: Business Design Centre, 52 Upper St, London, UK
🔗 Official site: https://london25.domainsummit.com/

Introduction to domain name disputes

In 2025, with over 370 million domain names registered worldwide and continuous growth in e-commerce, domain name disputes represent a major challenge for businesses, brands, and institutions. A hijacked domain name can result in a 15-25% loss in revenue according to a WIPO study.

Dispute resolution mechanisms vary by extension: while the UDRP procedure (Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy) applies to generic domains (.com, .net, .org), each national registry develops its own solutions, such as SYRELI for .fr, INDRP for .in, or specific procedures for Chinese .cn domains.

Why is this article essential?

This comprehensive guide will enable you to:

• Understand different dispute resolution procedures
• Choose the optimal strategy according to your situation
• Estimate costs and timeframes for each procedure
• Discover recent case law and 2024-2025 trends
• Implement effective preventive protection

What is a domain name dispute?

Legal definition

A domain name dispute occurs when a third party registers a domain name that:

1. Infringes on prior rights of a trademark holder
2. Creates confusion in the public’s mind
3. Diverts legitimate traffic to competing or malicious sites
4. Harms the reputation of the brand or company

The 7 most common types of disputes

1. Cybersquatting (domain name warehousing)

• Definition: Speculative registration of famous domain names
• Objective: Resale at high prices to the legitimate holder
• Example: apple-store.com registered by a third party to be resold to Apple

2. Typosquatting (typographical hijacking)

• Definition: Registration of common misspelled variants
• Examples: amazone.com, gooogle.com, facebok.com
• Impact: Diverts 3-8% of traffic according to studies

3. Domain slamming (domain name scam)

• Technique: Sending false renewal invoices
• Trap: The holder believes they’re renewing but transfers to another registrar
• Prevalence: +45% in 2024 according to ICANN

4. Reverse domain name hijacking

• Definition: Abusive recovery attempt by the complainant
• Sanction: Adverse decision and possible damages
• Criteria: Manifest bad faith by the applicant

5. Commercial parasitism

• Method: Using the name to redirect to competition
• Damage: Direct loss of customers and revenue
• Affected sectors: E-commerce, services, luxury

6. Reputation attack (gripe sites)

• Objective: Criticize or denigrate a brand
• Forms: [brand]sucks.com, [brand]complaints.org
• Legal limits: Protection by freedom of expression in some cases

7. Phishing and fraud

• Danger: Identity theft and data theft
• Techniques: Similar names to deceive users
• Issues: Computer security and consumer protection

UDRP procedure: international standard for gTLDs

History and evolution of UDRP

The UDRP procedure was created in 1999 by ICANN to address the explosion of domain name disputes. Since its creation:

• Over 80,000 procedures have been initiated
• Average success rate: 85% for complainants
• Extensions covered: All gTLDs (.com, .net, .org, .info, .biz, etc.)
• Approved centers: WIPO, Forum, ADNDRC, CAC, CNNIC

Detailed admissibility criteria

The complainant must demonstrate cumulatively three conditions:

1. Identity or confusing similarity

Tests applied by experts:

• Visual test: Graphic comparison of signs
• Phonetic test: Similar pronunciation
• Conceptual test: Evocation of the same idea
• Extension consideration: Generally ignored in analysis

Jurisprudential examples:

✅ microsoft.com vs MICROSOFT trademark: perfect identity
✅ coca-cola.net vs COCA-COLA trademark: hyphen not determinant
❌ apple-trees.com vs APPLE trademark: significant addition modifying meaning

2. Absence of rights or legitimate interests

Evaluation criteria:

• Priority of registration compared to trademark rights
• Legitimate commercial use of the domain name
• Own notoriety of the holder under this name
• Fair non-commercial use (criticism, parody, information)

Accepted defense means:

• Prior good faith commercial exploitation
• Family name or first name of the holder
• Use for criticism (with limitations)
• Documented legitimate commercial project

3. Registration and use in bad faith

Bad faith indicators (non-exhaustive list):

At registration:

• Obvious knowledge of the trademark
• Registration of multiple variants
• History of cybersquatting by the holder
• Immediate buyback request

During use:

• Attempt to sell to trademark holder
• Direct unfair competition
• Phishing or malicious site
• Redirection to inappropriate content
• Advertising parking exploiting the trademark

Detailed UDRP procedure process

Phase 1: Preparation and filing (Duration: Variable)

1. Mandatory preliminary analysis

• Verification of trademark rights
• Prior art search
• Analysis of domain name usage
• Success probability assessment

2. Case file constitution

• Detailed complaint (generally 10-30 pages)
• Proof of trademark rights
• Elements demonstrating bad faith
• Certified translations if necessary

3. Choice of center and language

• WIPO: 68% of procedures, recognized expertise
• Forum: 28% of procedures, speed
• ADNDRC: Asia-Pacific specialist
• Language: Agreement between parties, or registration contract language

Phase 2: Administrative review (3-5 days)

• Verification of file completeness
• Payment of fees (1,500 USD for single expert WIPO) plus variable counsel fees depending on case complexity
• Notification to respondent by email and mail
• Publication on center’s website

Phase 3: Respondent’s response (20 days)

Common defense strategies:

• Challenging complainant’s rights
• Demonstrating legitimate interest
• Proof of good faith
• “Reverse domain name hijacking” exception

Phase 4: Expert appointment (5 days)

UDRP expert profiles:

• Lawyers specialized in intellectual property
• International experience required
• Mandatory continuing education
• Certified independence and impartiality

Phase 5: Instruction and decision (14 days)

• Examination of evidence and arguments
• Possibility of additional information
• Legally motivated decision
• Publication of decision

UDRP statistics 2024

SYRELI: the French solution for .fr domains

Presentation of the French system

AFNIC (French Association for Internet Naming in Cooperation) manages the extensions .fr, .re, .pm, .yt, .tf, .wf. Since 2011, it offers two alternative procedures:

1. SYRELI: Internet dispute extrajudicial resolution system
2. PARL Expert: Online rapid arbitration procedure

SYRELI: detailed procedure

Filing conditions

The complainant must demonstrate that the domain name:

• Infringes on their rights (trademark, trade name, corporate name)
• Is registered or used illegally or abusively

Differences with UDRP:

• No explicit bad faith requirement, application of French law broader than UDRP
• Broader notion of “abusive use”
• Consideration of French law

SYRELI advantages

1. Exceptional speed

• Average timeframe: 32 days
• Record: 18 days for simple cases
• 100% dematerialized procedure

2. Affordable cost

• Free for respondent
• 250 EUR excl. tax fee for applicant (2025 rate) + variable counsel fees depending on case complexity
• No hidden or additional fees

3. French expertise

• Experts in French and European law
• Knowledge of French market
• Decisions in French

4. Procedural flexibility

• Possibility of prior mediation
• Exchanges in French only
• Adaptation to local specificities

SYRELI statistics 2024

PARL Expert: the WIPO alternative

Specificities

• Organized by: WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
• Experts: Specialized international panel
• Language: French or English
• Cost: 1,500 euros in fees (single expert), variable counsel fees should be budgeted depending on case complexity

When to choose PARL Expert?

• Complex disputes requiring international expertise
• Important economic stakes (> 100k€)
• Desired jurisprudential precedent
• International parties

Country-specific procedures and extensions

🇷🇺 Russian Federation (.ru, .рф)

2025 regulatory context

Since international sanctions in 2022, the Russian domain name system has evolved:

• Registry: Coordination Center for TLD RU
• Procedures: Private arbitration or Russian courts
• Constraints: Access limitations for foreign companies

Resolution mechanisms

1. RU-CENTER arbitration

• Timeframe: 3-6 months
• Language: Russian mandatory
• Success rate: 65% (2024)

2. Judicial procedure

• Competent courts: Moscow or respondent’s headquarters
• Timeframe: 6-18 months
• High cost with mandatory local representation

Legal specificities

• Applicable law: Russian Civil Code
• Evidence: Certified translation mandatory
• Enforcement: Complexity with current sanctions

🇨🇳 People’s Republic of China (.cn, .中国)

CNNIC system and procedures

Registry: China Internet Network Information Center Available procedures:

1. CNNIC Policy (UDRP-inspired)
2. CIETAC (China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission)
3. Beijing Arbitration Commission

CNNIC domain name dispute resolution policy

Criteria (identical to UDRP):

• Identity/similarity with trademark
• Absence of legitimate rights
• Registration/use in bad faith

Chinese specificities:

• Enhanced consideration of registered Chinese trademarks
• Protection of Chinese geographical names
• Mandatory local expertise for certain sectors

It is also possible to act through the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center.

Approved arbitration centers

1. Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Center (ADNDRC)

• Timeframe: 45-60 days
• Languages: Chinese, English
• Success rate: 89% (2024)

2. CIETAC

• More traditional, longer procedures
• Recognized commercial expertise
• Higher cost

Notable 2024 case law

• Louis Vuitton vs malletlouis.cn: Transfer granted
• BMW vs bmw-parts.cn: Rejection for legitimate spare parts use
• McDonald’s vs 麦当劳.cn: Enhanced protection for Chinese characters

🇮🇳 India (.in, .भारत)

INDRP: IN domain name dispute resolution policy

Authority: National Internet Exchange of India (NIXI) Creation: 2005, revised in 2021

INDRP criteria (adapted to Indian context)

1. Abusive registration: Broader notion than UDRP bad faith
2. Prior rights: Indian trademarks privileged
3. Legitimate use: Consideration of local commercial traditions

Procedural specificities

Approved centers:

• NIXI Panel: Indian and international experts
• WIPO India: Local WIPO branch
• CAM India: Arbitration and Mediation Center

Characteristics:

• Timeframe: 45-75 days
• Languages: English, Hindi
• Success rate: 82% (2024)

Case law trends

• Increased protection for Bollywood trademarks
• Recognition of Indian family names
• IT sector: Enhanced legitimate defenses

🇩🇪 Germany (.de)

DENIC and amicable resolution

Registry: DENIC eG Philosophy: Favor amicable solutions

Available procedures

1. DENIC Konfliktlösung (conflict resolution)

• Free, based on good will
• Pure mediation without binding power. Otherwise, action before German courts is necessary
• Resolution rate: 45%

2. DIS arbitration (Deutsche Institution für Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit)

• Formal paid procedure
• Timeframe: 3-6 months

3. German courts

• Competence of Landgerichten
• Procedure: 6-18 months
• Technical expertise required

🇧🇷 Brazil (.br)

NIC.br and SACI procedure

System: SACI (Sistema de Solução de Conflitos de Internet) Managed by: Centro de Solução de Conflitos de Internet

SACI characteristics

• Total free for all parties
• Mandatory prior mediation
• Arbitration if mediation fails
• Overall timeframe: 60-90 days

Specific criteria

• Application of Brazilian law
• Enhanced protection for local trademarks
• Consideration of unregistered prior use

Practical guide: how to choose your procedure

Decision tree for choosing optimal procedure

1. Extension identification

Disputed domain name extension

├── gTLD (.com, .net, .org, .info, etc.) → UDRP

├── .fr, .re, .pm, .yt, .tf, .wf → SYRELI or PARL Expert

├── ccTLD with dedicated procedure (.cn, .in, .ru, etc.) → Local procedure

└── ccTLD without procedure → National courts

2. Choice criteria between procedures

For French extensions (.fr):

• SYRELI if: Simple case, limited budget, speed priority
• PARL Expert if: Complex case, important stakes, desired precedent

For gTLD with center choice:

• WIPO: Maximum expertise, complex cases
• Forum: Speed, standard cases
• ADNDRC: Disputes involving Asia

Multi-criteria decision matrix

Practical cases and recommendations

Case 1: French startup victim of cybersquatting on .com

Situation: brand-startup.com registered by third party Recommendation: UDRP via WIPO Justification: .com extension, recognized procedure, acceptable timeframe

Case 2: SME with name.fr hijacked

Situation: Competitor uses similar name in .fr Recommendation: SYRELI Justification: Speed, cost, French expertise

Case 3: International group with multiple extensions

Situation: Coordinated cybersquatting .com/.cn/.in Recommendation: Combined UDRP + local procedures strategy Justification: Global approach, local expertise needed

Detailed comparative timeframes

Detailed timeframes by phase

UDRP (total timeframe: 45-65 days)

Preparatory phase (variable)

├── Analysis and counsel: 1-2 weeks

├── File constitution: 1-3 weeks

└── Filing and verification: 3-5 days

Contradictory phase (40 fixed days)

├── Respondent notification: 3 days

├── Response deadline: 20 days

├── Expert appointment: 5 days

├── Possible rejoinder: 5 days

└── Decision: 14 days

SYRELI (total timeframe: 20-45 days)

Accelerated processing

├── Filing and verification: 2-3 days

├── Notification: 2-3 days

├── Respondent response: 15 days

└── Decision: 10-15 days

ROI and cost/benefit analysis

Return on investment calculation

Positive factors:

• Recovery of diverted traffic
• Reputation protection
• Avoidance of judicial costs
• Resolution speed

Financial estimation:

• Monthly revenue loss (average): 5,000-50,000 EUR
• Extrajudicial procedure cost: 2,000-10,000 EUR
• Judicial procedure cost: 15,000-100,000 EUR
• Average extrajudicial procedure ROI: 300-500%

Case law and case studies 2024-2025

Major jurisprudential developments

1. Artificial intelligence and domain names

Trend: Multiplication of AI-related disputes Emblematic case: openai-gpt.com vs OpenAI Inc.

• Decision: Transfer granted (UDRP D2024-0234)
• Grounds: Commercial exploitation of reputation
• Impact: Extended protection to technological terms

2. Metaverse and Web3

Problem: Domain names linked to cryptocurrencies Example: ethereum-wallet.org vs Ethereum Foundation

• Complexity: Unregistered trademarks in some countries
• Solution: Proof of international notoriety
• Teaching: Necessary anticipation for tech brands

3. Evolution of bad faith criteria

New recognized indicators:

• Use of misleading SSL certificates
• Exploitation of mobile typing errors
• Creation of AI-generated content imitating the brand
• Paid referencing on the brand name

Case analysis by business sector

Luxury sector

Louis Vuitton vs lvbags-outlet.com (UDRP D2024-1156)

• Context: Counterfeiting site
• Defense: Authorized reseller (false)
• Decision: Transfer + damages
• Lesson: Enhanced surveillance necessary

Chanel vs chanelperfumes.net (SYRELI 2024-FR-0089)

• Particularity: French respondent
• Defense argument: Generic name “perfumes”
• Decision: Transfer (famous trademark prevails)
• Timeframe: 23-day record

Technology sector

Microsoft vs microsoft-teams-download.org

• Problem: Malware distribution
• Urgency: Interim injunction obtained
• Procedure: UDRP + criminal action
• Result: Transfer + prosecution

E-commerce and marketplaces

Amazon vs amazon-prime-deals.com

• Technique: Disguised affiliation
• Difficulty: Proving lack of authorization
• Solution: Production of affiliation contracts
• Outcome: Transfer granted

Remarkable decisions by jurisdiction

WIPO 2024 decisions

Top 3 most cited decisions:

1. Nike Inc. vs sportswear-nike.online (D2024-0567)
   • Innovation: Social media consideration
   • Impact: Broadening of bad faith notion
2. Airbnb vs airbnb-stays.travel (D2024-0789)
   • Question: .travel extension and legitimacy
   • Answer: Extension doesn’t automatically confer legitimacy
3. Tesla vs tesla-autopilot.ai (D2024-0912)
   • Issue: Technical term vs trademark
   • Teaching: Commercial context determining

SYRELI developments

2024 qualitative statistics:

• 91% success for applicants (record)
• 32 days average timeframe (-4 days)
• Growing sectors: Health (+67%), FinTech (+45%)

Landmark decision: sante-covid.fr

• Context: Medical disinformation site
• Applicant: Ministry of Health
• Defense: Freedom of expression
• Decision: Transfer (public order priority)
• Timeframe: 18 days (emergency procedure)

Reverse domain name hijacking: sanctioned cases

Definition and sanctions

Reverse domain name hijacking (RDNH) sanctions abusive complainants who:

• Use UDRP procedure improperly
• Have no legitimate rights to the name
• Act knowingly

Applied sanctions:

• Mention in decision
• Damages in certain jurisdictions
• Blacklisting by centers

Recent sanctioned cases

Facebook vs face-book.com (D2024-0445)

• Error: Name registered before Facebook creation
• Sanction: RDNH established
• Cost: 50,000 USD in damages

Apple vs apple-trees.org (D2024-0678)

• Context: Legitimate gardening site
• Abuse: Portfolio expansion attempt
• Result: RDNH + respondent’s attorney fees

Preventive protection strategies

Optimal domain name portfolio

1. Essential extensions by company type

French local SME:

• .fr (mandatory)
• .com (recommended)
• .eu (if European activity)

International company:

• .com, .net, .org (classic triptych)
• ccTLD of strategic markets (.de, .uk, .cn, .in)
• New sectoral gTLD (.tech, .shop, .finance)

Luxury brand:

• Maximum protection: 50+ extensions
• Extended surveillance: variations and typos
• Premium extensions: .luxury, .fashion, .style

2. Defensive naming strategies

Spelling variations:

• Hyphen: brand-name.com, brandname.com
• Plurals: brands.com, brand.com
• Abbreviations: br-and.com, brnd.com

Typosquatting protection:

• Adjacent characters: nrand.com, bramd.com
• Omissions: brand.com, brnd.com
• Doubles: bbrand.com, brandd.com

Optimal number calculation:

Risk score = (Reputation × Digital revenue × Sensitive sector) / 1000

Number of domains = Score × 15 + priority extensions

Automated surveillance and monitoring

1. Recommended monitoring tools

Professional solutions:

IPzen (Harbor Technologies)

• Coverage: 1000+ extensions
• Alerts: Real-time
• Cost: 500-1500 EUR/year/brand
• Advantages: Legal security, limits risk of abusive actions, can also manage UDRP and other alternative dispute resolution procedures

2. Setting up effective monitoring

Optimal configuration:

• Main keywords: Exact trademark
• Variations: +50 typographical variants
• Extensions: Priority + extended surveillance
• Frequency: Daily for sensitive brands

Alert processing workflow:

Alert detected

├── Automatic analysis (AI/rules)

├── Risk classification (High/Medium/Low)

├── Legal team notification

├── Action according to established procedure

└── Follow-up and monthly reporting

Contracts and preventive clauses

1. Clauses in commercial contracts

Distributors and resellers:

Article X – Domain names

The distributor is prohibited from registering any domain name

incorporating the [BRAND] trademark without prior written

authorization from the grantor. In case of violation, the grantor

may require immediate transfer without compensation.

Employees and executives:

Article Y – Digital intellectual property

The employee undertakes not to register domain names

related to the company’s activity, except by express mission.

Any unauthorized registration will be considered a violation

of the duty of loyalty.

2. Enhanced general terms of sale

Protection against wild affiliation:

• Prohibition on using the name in domains
• Obligation to declare promotional sites
• Sanctions in case of violation

Rapid response plan

1. Emergency procedures

Detection of new suspicious domain:

• H+2: Verification and documentation
• H+24: Strategy decision (negotiation/procedure)
• D+3: Implementation of chosen action
• D+7: First effectiveness assessment

Escalation according to risk:

• Low risk: Amicable negotiation
• Medium risk: Formal notice + procedure
• High risk: Immediate procedure + injunction if necessary

2. Dedicated team and responsibilities

Recommended composition:

• IP lawyer: Strategic decision
• Digital manager: Technical assessment
• General management: Budget validation
• External counsel: Procedural expertise

Complete FAQ – domain name disputes

General questions

Q1: What differentiates a domain name from a trademark?

A: A domain name is a technical address on the Internet, while a trademark is a distinctive sign protected by intellectual property law. Conflict arises when a domain name incorporates a trademark without authorization, creating confusion for consumers.

A trademark benefits from strong legal protection upon registration, while domain name registration only confers technical usage rights to this Internet address.

Q2: How long does it take to recover a domain name?

A: Timeframes vary by procedure:

• SYRELI (.fr): 20-45 days on average
• UDRP (gTLD): 45-65 days
• National procedures: 60-120 days
• Courts: 6-24 months

The speed record belongs to SYRELI with 18 days for a health emergency case in 2024.

Q3: Can I recover a domain name without having a registered trademark?

A: It’s very difficult but not impossible. You can rely on:

• Trade name used previously
• Prior corporate name
• Copyright on the name
• Notoriety acquired without registration

However, 90% of successful procedures rely on a registered trademark, which constitutes the strongest proof of your rights.

Q4: What to do if I receive a formal notice for my domain name?

A: Don’t panic and follow these steps:

1. Analyze the legitimacy of the demand
2. Verify your rights to the name (anteriority, legitimate use)
3. Document your good faith (screenshots, usage proof)
4. Consult a specialist before responding
5. Negotiate if relevant or prepare your defense

Important: Never transfer the domain immediately under pressure.

Technical questions about procedures

Q5: What’s the difference between UDRP and SYRELI?

A:

Q6: Can I appeal a UDRP, SYRELI, or PARL Expert decision?

A:

• UDRP: No appeal possible, but judicial action
• SYRELI: No appeal, but judicial recourse possible
• PARL Expert: No appeal, but judicial recourse possible

Judicial appeal suspends execution of transfer decision.

Q7: How to prove bad faith in a UDRP procedure?

A: Most effective bad faith indicators:

At registration:

• Obvious knowledge of your trademark
• Registration of multiple variations
• Immediate buyback request
• History of cybersquatting

During use:

• Phishing site or direct competitor
• Advertising parking exploiting your trademark
• High-price sale attempt
• Total absence of use (warehousing)

Evidence to constitute:

• Time-stamped screenshots
• Negotiation emails
• Traffic analyses
• Research on the holder

Q8: How much does a UDRP procedure really cost?

A: Typical total cost for a UDRP procedure:

Direct fees:

• WIPO (1 expert): 1,500 USD
• Forum (1 expert): 1,350 USD but there may be other fees depending on responses and suspensions

Indirect fees:

• Attorney/counsel fees: 1,000-8,000 EUR
• Translations: 500-2,000 EUR
• Investigations: 500-2,000 EUR

Global budget: 3,000-12,000 EUR depending on case complexity

For an SME, SYRELI remains the most economical option: 250 EUR + 1,500-3,000 EUR in fees = total budget < 3,500 EUR.

Strategic questions

Q9: Should I negotiate or go directly to procedure?

A: Prior negotiation is recommended if:

• The holder seems in good faith
• Usage is not directly competitive
• Buyback cost remains reasonable (< procedure cost)
• Time is not critical

Go directly to procedure if:

• Manifestly fraudulent usage
• Extortion attempt
• Direct competitor
• Phishing/malware site

Statistic: 60% of negotiations succeed in < 30 days with an average cost of 900-5,000 EUR.

Q10: How to effectively protect my brand on the Internet?

A: 5-level protection strategy:

Level 1 – Basic protection:

• Registration .com + .fr + target country extensions
• Monthly automated surveillance
• Clauses in commercial contracts

Level 2 – Enhanced protection:

• +10 priority extensions
• Main spelling variations
• Weekly surveillance

Level 3 – Extended protection:

• +30 sectoral extensions
• Complete typosquatting protection
• Daily surveillance + social networks

Level 4 – Maximum protection:

• 100+ domain names
• Advanced detection AI
• Dedicated internal team

Annual budget indication:

• Level 1: 1,000-3,000 EUR
• Level 2: 5,000-15,000 EUR
• Level 3: 15,000-50,000 EUR
• Level 4: 50,000+ EUR

Q11: What to do in case of massive cybersquatting on my brand? A: Graduated response strategy:

Phase 1 – Assessment (1-2 weeks)

• Complete inventory of infringing domains
• Classification by risk level
• Recovery cost evaluation

Phase 2 – Priority actions (1 month)

• Procedures on high-risk domains
• Negotiations on intermediate cases
• Enhanced monitoring

Phase 3 – Systematic cleanup (3-6 months)

• Grouped procedures
• Legal action if necessary
• Implementation of preventive protection

Total cost: 10,000-100,000 EUR depending on scope, but ROI generally > 300%.

Q12: How to know if my domain name has chances of being recovered? A: Quick self-assessment (scoring out of 100):

Prior rights (30 points max):

• Identical registered trademark: 30 pts
• Similar trademark: 20 pts
• Prior trade name: 15 pts
• No formal rights: 0 pt

Usage of the disputed domain (40 points max):

• Direct competitor site: 40 pts
• Brand advertising parking: 35 pts
• Sale/negotiation: 30 pts
• Generic unrelated site: 10 pts
• No usage: 20 pts

Evidence of bad faith (30 points max):

• Extortion attempt: 30 pts
• Registration post-notoriety: 25 pts
• Multiple similar domains: 20 pts
• Masked/false contact: 15 pts

Results interpretation:

• 80-100 points: Very good chances (>90%)
• 60-79 points: Good chances (70-90%)
• 40-59 points: Average chances (50-70%)
• <40 points: Low chances (<50%)

Conclusion: Towards optimal digital protection

In 2025, domain name protection constitutes a major strategic issue for any organization with a digital presence. The constant evolution of extensions, the emergence of new forms of cybersquatting and the increasing complexity of the international legal landscape make a structured and preventive approach essential.

Key points to remember

1. Diversity of solutions: Each extension has its specific mechanisms
2. Effectiveness of extrajudicial procedures: 85-90% success rate
3. Importance of speed: The earlier the action, the better the chances
4. Positive ROI: Recovery procedures are generally profitable
5. Essential prevention: Better to protect than to suffer

Dreyfus Law Firm expertise

With more than 20 years of experience in intellectual property and new technologies law, Dreyfus Law Firm assists its clients in:

• Domain name portfolio audit
• Personalized preventive protection strategies
• UDRP, SYRELI, PAR Expert and international recovery procedures
• Amicable negotiations and mediation
• Automated monitoring and legal watch
• Internal team training

Future developments to anticipate

2025-2026: Emerging trends

• Generative AI and new types of counterfeiting
• Metaverse and virtual brand protection
• Blockchain and decentralized domain names
• Reinforced European regulation (DSA/DMA)

Our commitment: Accompanying our clients through these changes for excellent digital protection.

Need help protecting your domain names?

In today’s digital landscape, having a strong online presence is essential for virtually every business.
The domain name is not just a technical address but rather a strategic asset and the first impression many customers get when interacting with your brand on the internet. Losing control over your domain name or failing to protect it adequately can lead to severe consequences such as lost traffic, reputational harm, or even costly legal disputes.

In this extensive guide (up to 10,000 words), we will explore all facets of domain name protection – from the relevant legal framework (covering aspects like unfair competition and trademark infringement) to practical strategies for ensuring a proactive defense (monitoring, recovering expired domains, multiple TLD registrations, etc.) and handling complex issues (UDRP, Syreli, conflicts with prior or subsequent trademarks).

Specifically, we’ll cover:

• Why protecting a domain name is crucial;
• Relevant legal and regulatory bases (such as article L.45 of the CPCE for .fr domains in France, the Intellectual Property Code, etc.);
• The differences between a domain name vs. an earlier or later trademark;
• Best practices for securing and monitoring your digital portfolio;
• The role of unfair competition and trademark infringement actions to enforce your rights;
• Recovering an expired or third-party-held domain name through auctions, backorders, or legal proceedings;
• A thorough FAQ addressing key questions (e.g., “How do I prove domain name ownership?” “What are the three components of a domain name?”).

We’ll reinforce everything with practical examples and statistics (such as the number of disputes handled through the UDRP, average resolution times, etc.). Finally, we’ll illustrate how a specialized firm like Dreyfus can help ensure robust and lasting protection of your online presence.

1. Why Is Domain Name Protection So Critical?

In a highly competitive digital world, your domain name represents the core of your brand’s online footprint. It serves as a unique identifier for search engines and internet users. Losing control of your domain name can result in:

• Loss of visibility: If a third party registers a confusingly similar name, it can siphon off your web traffic or create consumer confusion.
• Reputational damage: A cybersquatter might host malicious or defamatory content under a domain that people associate with your brand.
• Exorbitant costs: Legal or extrajudicial recoveries can be lengthy and expensive, with no guaranteed outcome.
• Risk of legal sanction: If you accidentally infringe on someone else’s earlier trademark by using a conflicting domain, you could face a lawsuit and potential liability.

According to a Verisign study, there were about 350 million registered domain names globally (across all TLDs) by the end of 2022. Every day, over 100,000 new domains are created, while thousands expire or change registrants. In this dynamic environment, vigilance is paramount.

2. Legal Framework and Key Regulations

2.1. Article L.45 of the CPCE

In France, Article L.45 of the Code des postes et des communications électroniques (CPCE), accessible on Legifrance, grants AFNIC authority over national extensions (.fr, .re, etc.). Its guiding principles include:

• Compliance with public order;
• Non-infringement of third-party rights (trademarks, corporate names, etc.);
• Transparency and non-discrimination in domain allocation;
• An option for alternative dispute resolution methods (Syreli, PARL Expert) in case of conflict.

2.2. Intellectual Property Code (CPI)

The Intellectual Property Code (CPI) applies when a domain name conflicts with a prior IP right, such as a trademark. Articles L.713-2 and L.713-3 address trademark infringement, including unauthorized use of a distinctive sign that is confusingly similar or identical to an existing trademark. A domain name can be a “distinctive sign,” so using it without permission to market similar goods/services can constitute infringement if confusion is likely.

2.3. Article 1240 of the French Civil Code (ex 1382)

When you do not have a registered trademark, you may still sue an imitator under unfair competition principles (based on Article 1240 of the Civil Code). This requires showing a fault (imitation, confusion, parasitism) plus damage and a causal link. This approach is commonly used if two domains in the same business sector cause confusion or if one party is free-riding on another’s reputation.

3. Domain Name vs. Trademark: Earlier or Later Rights

DOMAIN NAME VS. EARLIER TRADEMARK

If there is an earlier trademark (valid and registered) and you register a domain name that is identical or highly similar for related goods/services, you risk trademark infringement. Courts worldwide consistently condemn domain owners who hijack a brand’s recognition or create confusion with an established mark.

DOMAIN NAME VS. LATER TRADEMARK

Conversely, if you have been actively using a domain name for years (even without a trademark registration), and someone else later decides to file a trademark that is identical or closely similar to your domain name, you can sometimes rely on your prior usage to challenge or invalidate that later trademark. You must demonstrate substantial and continuous usage, e.g., website archives, commercial documents, etc.

4. Key Steps to Protect and Secure Your Domain Name

4.1. Prior Checks and Searches

Before registering a domain name, it’s essential to perform:

• A WHOIS lookup to confirm availability and identify any existing owner;
• A review of trademark databases (e.g., INPI for France, EUIPO for the EU, WIPO internationally) to avoid conflicts;
• A check of commercial registers (e.g., Infogreffe in France) for similar corporate names.

This preliminary step reduces the risk of inadvertently infringing earlier rights.

4.2. Choosing the Right TLD

The .fr extension is pivotal in France, while .com remains a global favorite. New TLDs (nTLDs) like .tech, .shop, or .city can refine your branding strategy but be aware of cybersquatting if they aren’t also protected.

4.3. Technical and Administrative Security

Many disputes stem from negligence such as forgetting to renew a domain. We strongly recommend automatic renewal with your registrar and enabling registry lock or transfer lock. Limit domain management to trustworthy personnel so an employee can’t transfer ownership to their personal name or a competitor.

4.4. Registering a Trademark if Necessary

If your domain name is a crucial branding element, registering it as a trademark with the INPI (France) or under the Madrid system (international) significantly enhances protection. In any potential dispute, you can pursue a trademark infringement action rather than relying solely on unfair competition.

5. Unfair Competition Actions

Unfair competition is based on civil liability rules (cf. Article 1240 of the French Civil Code, formerly Article 1382). It’s particularly relevant when you don’t have a trademark registration, or the mark’s scope doesn’t fully apply to the domain conflict.

5.1. Elements to Prove

• Fault: e.g., imitation, creating confusion, or parasitism of your brand or domain;
• Damage: lost customers, reputational harm, or traffic diversion;
• Causation: the defendant’s conduct is the direct cause of the harm.

5.2. Illustrative Ruling

Paris High Court (TGI), January 10, 2017 (RG No. 15/07963):
The company operating exemple-luxe.com sued exempledeluxe.fr for unfair competition, alleging that the domain caused confusion among consumers. The court sided with the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to cease using the infringing domain and pay damages.

5.3. Advantages and Drawbacks

Unfair competition is flexible and doesn’t require showing a registered IP title like a trademark. However, proving actual harm (loss, confusion) can sometimes be more demanding than trademark infringement, which relies on the existence of a valid earlier mark to demonstrate a direct violation.

6. Trademark Infringement Actions

If you hold an earlier registered trademark, a trademark infringement lawsuit often provides a stronger remedy than unfair competition. You would invoke Articles L.713-2 and L.713-3 of the French IP Code. Infringement requires you to prove:

• A valid prior trademark;
• Unauthorized use of an identical or confusingly similar sign;
• A likelihood of confusion among the relevant public or (for famous marks) a risk of diluting the mark’s distinctiveness.

6.1. Proving Mark Existence

You need to show that your trademark is duly registered and not subject to invalidation or non-use cancellation. If the defendant challenges the trademark (arguing you haven’t used it for over five years, for instance), you may have to demonstrate genuine use to maintain your rights.

6.2. Example Ruling

Paris Court of Appeal, March 2, 2020 (RG No. 18/26345):
The domain marqueXYZ-online.com infringed the earlier trademark “MARQUEXYZ,” as it created a likelihood of confusion. The court ordered transfer of the domain and awarded damages to the trademark owner.

6.3. Scope of Application

Trademark infringement typically applies to commercial use of the domain name. If the domain is used non-commercially or in a completely different industry, confusion may be harder to establish. But for well-known (famous) marks, protection can extend to dissimilar goods/services if there is risk of tarnishment or dilution.

7. Why Monitor Your Domain Names?

Proactive monitoring of your domain(s) (or an entire domain portfolio) involves setting up alerts or scanning systems to foresee or detect:

• Impending expiration: so you can renew in time and avoid losing the domain to a third party;
• Cybersquatting: unscrupulous individuals may register near-identical domains (typosquatting, brandjacking);
• Brand abuse: if new domains incorporate your brand or a misleading segment thereof;
• Excessive resale prices: squatters may try to extort large sums if you let your domain lapse or if you need to buy it back quickly.

7.1. Services and Tools

Many registrars provide a “watch service” or specialized monitoring solutions.
You can also implement custom scripts or sign up for WHOIS alerts.
The AFNIC (the .fr registry) offers additional monitoring tools for .fr extension domains.

7.2. Recommended Practices

As part of a global strategy, consider:

• Centralized management: using a single or limited set of registrars to keep track of all your domains.
• Documentation: maintaining an up-to-date record (spreadsheet or dedicated software) of each domain’s expiration date, contact info, and relevant legal notes.
• Team training: ensuring your legal department and IT staff coordinate domain naming, renewals, and brand protection effectively.

8. Recovering an Expired or Third-Party Domain Name

Losing a domain name due to non-renewal or seeing it snatched by a malicious party can be challenging, but not always irreversible. Let’s explore the different methods to recover your domain name and how to keep it safe thereafter.

What Is Domain Recovery?

Domain recovery refers to the process of regaining or reacquiring a domain name that was previously held by someone else or had expired and returned to the public pool. Recovery can take the form of:

• Amiable negotiations: contacting the current registrant to purchase the domain directly;
• Auctions or backorder platforms: capturing domains in redemption phase or pending delete, often competing with other potential buyers;
• Extrajudicial proceedings (UDRP, Syreli) if the domain is used in bad faith and violates your rights;
• Judicial actions for unfair competition or infringement, if the domain is maliciously exploiting your brand or trade name.

Practical Steps to Recover an Expired Domain

1. Identify the domain’s current phase:
   • Grace period: the original owner may still renew;
   • Redemption period: domain is suspended but not publicly available;
   • Pending delete: domain is set to be released soon;
   • Released or auction phase: domain re-enters open registration or is up for bidding.
2. Select your approach:
   • Backorder via specialized platforms like SnapNames, Dropcatch, etc.;
   • Participate in any auction if the registrar holds a bidding process;
   • Register the domain directly if it’s fully released to the public.
3. Finalize acquisition:
   • Once recovered, set up DNS, verify WHOIS listing you as the registrant;
   • Enable auto-renew and domain lock to prevent losing it again.

How to Determine if a Domain Is Available for Recovery?

You can use dedicated tracking services such as Nom-domaine.fr or Domain Tools to check a domain’s actual status (active, redemption, pending delete). Some backorder services provide real-time status and will notify you once the domain is open for new registration or is in an auction phase.
In general, the domain is “available” if it is fully dropped and no longer in a grace or redemption period.

Note that popular or high-value domains can attract multiple bidders the moment they drop, so speed is essential to secure them.

9. Handling Disputes (UDRP, Syreli, Arbitration, Courts)

When a conflict arises — e.g., you believe someone else’s domain infringes your brand, or you’re accused of infringing a prior right — you have several options:

• Extrajudicial proceedings:
  • UDRP (Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy): for gTLDs like .com, .net, .org. Typically handled by ICANN-approved dispute centers such as WIPO.

    Duration: about 2–3 months.

    Outcome: transfer or cancellation of the domain if bad faith, no legitimate interest, and confusing similarity are proven.

  • Syreli or PARL Expert with AFNIC for .fr.

    Decisions often within a few weeks to a few months.

    Remedy: domain transfer or deletion if the domain violates L.45 CPCE or third-party rights.

• Judicial options:
  • Unfair competition (Civil Code, art. 1240), if no trademark but confusion or parasitism is established;
  • Trademark infringement (CPI L.713-2, L.713-3), if you hold an earlier trademark;
  • Arbitration if a contract or prior agreement stipulates it.

According to WIPO, about 65–70% of UDRP cases result in the complainant’s favor, often leading to domain transfer. Meanwhile, AFNIC indicates that “several hundred” Syreli or PARL Expert cases occur each year for .fr, with the majority concluding in transfer or cancellation where the domain clearly infringes a prior right or is used in bad faith.

10. Some Statistics and Trends

For a broader view of the phenomenon, here are a few data points:

• Globally, about 350 million domains were registered across all TLDs by the end of 2022 (source: Verisign).
• An estimated 3–5% of these are so-called “speculative” registrations, often used for parking, reselling, or cybersquatting (figures vary by TLD).
• WIPO handled 5,500–6,000 UDRP domain disputes in 2022, reflecting a continuous rise year over year.
• In the .fr space, “several hundred” Syreli/PARL Expert complaints are filed annually, mostly due to brand or trade name conflicts.

This highlights a strong momentum: disputes are increasing as digitalization expands, making anticipation and prevention the best ways to mitigate risk.

11. Comprehensive FAQ

How Do I Prove Ownership of a Domain Name?

Typically, you check the WHOIS record. The official registrant is shown there (often under “Registrant” or “Owner”). If you appear as the registrant, that is legal proof of ownership. Additionally, keep invoices, emails with your registrar, and historical screenshots to strengthen evidence in case of dispute.

How Do I Protect a Domain Name During a Conflict?

Depending on the context:

• UDRP or Syreli extrajudicial proceedings: if you show the domain was registered in bad faith and lacks legitimate interest by the respondent, it can be transferred to you.
• Trademark infringement action: if you own a prior mark. Courts may order cessation of use, domain transfer, and damages.
• Unfair competition: to show confusion or parasitism under civil liability rules.
• Amiable negotiation: sometimes buying the domain from its current holder is the fastest solution.

What Is the Validity Condition for a Domain Name?

From a technical standpoint, the domain must meet syntax and length rules. Legally, it must not violate public policy or others’ prior rights (Article L.45 CPCE). AFNIC can revoke or transfer a .fr if those conditions are breached.

What Are the 3 Components of a Domain Name?

Typically, a domain name is structured as follows:

• Subdomain (e.g., “www” or any other custom subdomain)
• The second-level name (e.g., “example”)
• The TLD (e.g., “.fr,” “.com,” “.net”)

So “www.example.fr” is divided into “www” (subdomain), “example” (root), and “.fr” (extension).

What Happens If I Don’t Monitor My Domain Name?

Without regular monitoring, you could:

• Accidentally let it expire and lose it to a competitor or cybersquatter;
• Remain unaware of near-identical domain registrations (typosquatting, brandjacking);
• Face stolen traffic or reputational harm;
• Pay exorbitant fees if forced to buy it back or engage in litigation.

How Do I Know If a Domain Name Is Expired or About to Expire?

Check the WHOIS record for the domain’s expiration date. Certain services (like ExpiredDomains.net) list domains nearing expiration or in redemption. Also, many registrars provide reminders or notifications for upcoming renewals.

How Long Does a UDRP Case Typically Last?

On average, 2–3 months. WIPO (the World Intellectual Property Organization) handles most disputes. The panel reviews the complainant’s and the respondent’s statements. Where the complainant proves bad faith and no legitimate interest, the panel typically orders transfer or cancellation of the domain.

How Many Cases Does WIPO Handle Each Year?

WIPO deals with 5,500–6,000 domain disputes annually under the UDRP. This figure has been steadily increasing, reflecting the expansion of digital commerce and domain speculation.

What If My .fr Domain Is Being Used by Someone Else?

You can:

• File a complaint under Syreli (handled by AFNIC) or PARL Expert for a quick extrajudicial resolution.
• Consider a court action based on unfair competition or infringement if a trademark is involved.

Procedures typically evaluate whether the domain violates L.45 CPCE or prior rights. If so, they can order a transfer or deletion.

12. Conclusion and Contact

This guide has taken you through the **complex realm** of domain name protection and recovery, covering:

• Legal frameworks in France (CPCE, IP Code) and relevant guidelines for TLDs;
• Practical strategies (monitoring, locks, multiple TLD coverage) to stay proactive;
• Legal actions (unfair competition, trademark infringement), along with extrajudicial options (UDRP, Syreli);
• Domain recovery (through auctions, backorder services, or negotiations) when a domain expires or is held by a third party;
• Statistics illustrating how domain disputes keep rising globally.

The key is a proactive approach: verifying availability, implementing robust security measures, and staying alert via monitoring. Engaging a specialized law firm can be invaluable for drafting an effective UDRP complaint, managing a Syreli dispute, litigating in court, or generally structuring your online portfolio’s legal defenses.

Looking for customized support?
Contact Dreyfus now to safeguard your domain names effectively.
Our team provides deep expertise in domain name law, trademark law, and IP strategy, ensuring your digital assets are fully protected and your rights enforced.

Afnic (Association Française pour le Nommage Internet en Coopération), which is responsible for managing domain names ending in .fr, has issued its decision in the dispute between the Syndicat des Vins Côtes de Provence and the company AOC ET COMPANIES. What is at stake? The domain name <cotesdeprovence.fr>, registered since 2004 by AOC ET COMPANIES. The Syndicat des Vins, the organization that protects and manages the “Côtes de Provence” appellation d’origine contrôlée (AOC), contested this ownership, arguing that its registration and use infringed the rights guaranteed by law on this renowned wine appellation.

After analyzing the arguments of both parties, Afnic ruled in favor of the Syndicate and ordered the transfer of the domain name to its benefit. A look back at a landmark decision that illustrates the importance of protecting geographical indications on the Internet.

A domain name at the heart of the battle

The dispute concerned the website <cotesdeprovence.fr>, registered on May 17, 2004 by the company AOC ET COMPANIES, which specializes in IT services and website creation. For almost 20 years, this domain name was not used. But in March 2024, the Côtes de Provence Wine Syndicate took steps to recover this domain, believing that it constituted misappropriation of a protected AOC.

According to the Syndicate, the “Côtes de Provence” AOC, recognized since 1977 and enjoying a strong reputation in France and internationally, had to be protected against any unauthorized commercial or private use. In particular, it invoked Article L. 45-2 of the French Postal and Electronic Communications Code, which allows a domain name to be challenged in the event of infringement of rights protected by law, such as a geographical indication or trademark.

In April 2024, the Syndicate sent a formal notice to the Holder requesting the free transfer of the domain. In response, the latter refused, explaining that he was the legitimate owner and indicating that he was only willing to transfer it as part of a commercial transaction.

Faced with this refusal, the Syndicat referred the matter to Afnic via the PARL EXPERT procedure, an arbitration mechanism dedicated to disputes over .fr domain names.

The parties’ arguments

The Côtes de Provence Wine Syndicate: an infringement of legally guaranteed rights

The Syndicate argued that the registration and renewal of the domain name <cotesdeprovence.fr>:

• Infringed upon the “Côtes de Provence” AOC, protected by the Rural Code and Maritime Fisheries (article L. 643-1).
• Were likely to weaken or divert the reputation of this AOC by preventing the legitimate rights holders from using the domain name.
• Were the result of a registration in bad faith, since the holder had no connection with the wine sector and had never used it to promote an activity related to the appellation.
• Were motivated by a purely speculative interest, as the Holder had offered to sell the domain for financial compensation.

The Holder, AOC ET COMPANIES: a desire to preserve its rights

For its part, the company AOC ET COMPANIES rejected these accusations, stating that:

• It had been the legitimate owner of the domain since 2004, having acquired it entirely legally according to the “first come, first served” rule applied by Afnic.
• The acronym “AOC” in its trade name did not refer to “Appellations d’Origine Contrôlée” (Controlled Designations of Origin), but to its slogan “[Surname] Optimizes your Trade and Etc.”
• The domain name did not infringe the rights of the Syndicate, as it had never been used to promote wines or a competing product.
• The sale of the domain was not a sign of bad faith, but a direct consequence of the Syndicate’s efforts to claim its transfer.

The Expert’s analysis: abusive private use of the domain name

The Expert appointed by Afnic examined the arguments and evidence of both parties. Several factors weighed in favor of the Syndicate:

• The protected nature of the “Côtes de Provence” AOC: the Expert recognized that this appellation, governed by an official decree of 1977, benefited from legal protection and could not be used without justification.
• The perfect identity between the domain name and the AOC: the domain <cotesdeprovence.fr> completely reflected the appellation, which risked creating confusion.
• The absence of legitimate exploitation: the Holder had never used the domain for 20 years and had no connection with the world of wine.
• The sale of the estate: the fact of having offered the domain name for sale and of promoting it on a dedicated site was perceived as an attempt at speculation, which constitutes evidence of bad faith according to article R. 20-44-46 of the CPCE.

Thus, the Expert considered that the registration and use of the domain infringed the rights guaranteed by law and that it should be transferred to the Côtes de Provence Wine Syndicate.

A decision in favor of the protection of geographical indications

On September 10, 2024, Afnic confirmed the Expert’s decision and ordered the transfer of the domain name <cotesdeprovence.fr> to the Syndicat des Vins Côtes de Provence.

The decision was enforced after a period of 15 days, during which time the Holder may still initiate legal proceedings if they so wish.

This case illustrates the importance of protecting geographical indications on the Internet. Domain names, as strategic communication and marketing tools, cannot be monopolized for speculative purposes when they include designations protected by law.

Nevertheless, this decision raises questions, because it calls into question the ownership of a domain name registered for 20 years. Although foreclosure does not apply in this case, it creates real legal uncertainty for domain name holders. In this case, this situation can be explained by the lack of use of the domain name during this entire period. In general, establishing a system of limitation for this type of procedure would be appropriate in order to guarantee legal certainty.

Dreyfus Law Firm, with its expertise in intellectual property and domain name protection, assists its clients in defending their rights against the risks of cybersquatting and infringement of their IP rights. We act in UDRP disputes, analyzing each case from the perspective of trademark law and regulations specific to protected geographical indications (PGI) and controlled designation of origin (CDO). Thanks to our experience in the strategic management of domain name portfolios, we implement tailored solutions to anticipate, monitor and defend the digital assets of our clients, whether they are producers, professional associations or companies in the wine and food industry.

FAQ

1. Can a registered designation of origin (AOC) be protected on the Internet?

Yes. An AOC is a distinctive sign protected by law. The registration of a domain name containing an AOC without legitimate justification may be contested by the organization in charge of its defense.

2. What can be done if a domain name contains an AOC without authorization?

The AOC defense organization may take legal action or resort to extrajudicial procedures such as PARL EXPERT with Afnic for .fr domain names, or UDRP for international extensions (.com, .org, etc.).

3. How does Afnic’s PARL EXPERT procedure work?

PARL EXPERT is a fast, out-of-court procedure for resolving disputes relating to .fr domain names. An expert examines the arguments of the parties and can decide on the transfer or deletion of the disputed domain name.

4. Is it possible to register a domain name for the sole purpose of reselling it?

No. Speculative registration of a domain name, without the intention of exploiting it but with the aim of reselling it at a high price, may be considered as use in bad faith and give rise to a dispute.

5. Can a domain name corresponding to an AOC be used by a company outside the sector?

The use of a domain name corresponding to an AOC by a company that has no connection with the sector concerned may be contested if it risks weakening or misappropriating the reputation of the appellation.

6. What criteria can be used to prove bad faith in the registration of a domain name?

Bad faith can be established if the domain holder:

• Has no legitimate interest in registering it,
• Seeks to profit from the reputation of an AOC or a trademark,
• Offers the domain for sale after being contacted by a right holder,
• Does not actively exploit it for a long period of time.

7. Can an AOC be considered as public property on the Internet?

No. AOCs are protected by legislation and cannot be freely used by third parties without authorization. They benefit from a specific legal framework that prevents their abusive appropriation.

8. Can an organization that defends an AOC recover a domain name without financial compensation?

Yes. If the organization demonstrates that the registration of the domain name infringes the AOC, Afnic or a competent authority may order its transfer without any obligation to compensate the original holder.

Dreyfus Law Firm works in partnership with a global network of lawyers specializing in intellectual property.

Follow us on social media!

LinkedIn  

Instagram